Reflecting on all those issues that rage these days on the net or in magazines, I thought of one thing, but what amount of data we are loading on line through this Web 2.0, how many GB and GB of memory used for uploading photos to Flickr or video on YouTube?
Sooner or later these areas will end, as eventually the space on your hard disk. Okay
memories that are increasingly large trade in cheap, but I think that this redundancy of information is leading us to gradually become accustomed to so much as "unclean" in the sense of "coming evil," not optimized, we will lose the having also an aesthetic sense that characterizes us as artists such as photographers or videographers.
Who tells me, a photo come bad that I keep the same memory, or a low-resolution movie that never look but I have saved on your PC, do not allow me to weed, let me lose sight of what you can give me a better product but by force of circumstances, present in smaller quantities?
People now browse, upload photos and then no one is looking, then open blog that does not use, send movies to glorify self ... but all this data, do we really need the development of Web 2.0 or is it just a way that most sites Clicks have to attract people and then advertising revenue?
